Friday, October 28, 2016

The internet says "Come Lord Jesus"

Gen. 11:1-9 recounts the story of the Tower of Babel. The nations of the world joined to live together speaking one language, building a tower to the heavens. The Lord confounded their language so that they scattered across the across the earth, and stopped construction. We get a hint at God's purposes in Acts 2:4-12. The Holy Spirit was poured out on Jesus' followers, resulting in a host of languages being spoken, and understood by onlookers. This conjugate work of God reveals His ultimate desire for a people in whom the presence of the Holy Spirit, made possible by the blood of Jesus, empowers those who welcome Him to join together to build His kingdom on earth. God frustrated the nations on the plain of Shinar because they were trying to do it on their own. We see the consummation of this work of God in Rev. 7:9, where a vast multitude of every nation, tribe, people, and language stand before God's throne to worship Him. By the way, these are those who witnessed to their faith in Christ by martyrdom at the hand of the kingdom of the Wildbeast (a.k.a. the Antichrist), mankind's final work.

What does the Internet have to do with all this? The internet's potential is staggering. The worldwide sharing of knowledge and ideas, augmented lately by automated translation, offers the hope of breaking ideological barriers and universal improvement in quality of life through the widespread dissemination of wisdom and best practices. Worldwide availability of a huge array of goods and virtual services, limited only by transportation, enables the dream of the classical economists of Pareto-optimality to be realized. Beyond that, the synergy of enterprising and creative entrepreneurs ranging from stay-at-home moms to billionaire inventors and innovators can create whole new industries and sources of wealth. Utopia is at hand! Except....

The first flaw in the ointment is cybercrime. This takes many forms: theft of information; credit card fraud; destruction of internet-connected databases, applications, domains, etc.; denial of service attacks; and even more devastating capabilities held in reserve by cyber-warfare units in many countries. All seem to threaten the utility of the Internet. But wait, there's more!

The foregoing is only the presenting symptom of the impact of sin on mankind's go-it-alone approach. The universal depravity of man manifests itself more subtly but in even more deadly ways in the content that internet enables. Consider the traditional seven deadly sins: Pride, avarice, wrath, lust, envy, gluttony, sloth. As just one example, the biggest single source of Internet traffic is reportedly pornography. Whether this simply cuts into the revenue of hard copy pornographers, or greatly expands its user community, only die-hard libertarians see this stoking the inferno of lust as a positive accomplishment. But even worse ...

The culminating flaw manifests itself when the internet's full potential is realized. Souls of kindred spirit and belief will join together in virtual and ultimately tangible communities to achieve their aspirations. Subject to physical proximity limitations in the past, we were forced to compromise with our neighbors to co-exist, to live and let live in peace. No more! We can now find those who agree with and encourage our narrow and self-righteous view of life. We split into a huge number of narrow but internally cohesive sects. This results in aspiring leaders - politicians, pundits, teachers, religious leaders - who will not compromise their rigid dogma. Although this might seem to be primarily manifest in extremist behavior in various groups in the mid-East, we saw this playing out in the 2016 Presidential election in the U. S. It will only intensify. God is confounding the speech of man as we talk past each other, unable to communicate.

Thomas Friedman wrote of this phenomenon in The World is Flat. Since the publication of his book, the intensity of Internet-driven behavior has only intensified. The problem is that there is no political or legal remedy to this social malaise. Genesis 11:8 records that construction of the Tower of Babel stopped and humankind was scattered over the earth when their speech was confounded. Is there any option to stop building the Internet? Clearly the Information Age is here to stay. Perhaps a feudal information  architecture is more suited to containing some of the consequences of sin, but this seems unlikely to happen, as the economic incentives for the current arrangements are so powerful. We no longer have the option of geographic dispersion, since the earth is full. God's judgment on fallen man seems to be the self-inflicted total devastation of human civilization. Regardless of who won the election, neither Donald nor Hilary can prevent this. The root cause is sin. That is the province of faith and religion.


Of the major religions of the world, most prescribe rule-following as the remedy for sin. This can take two forms. The more common is legal religious systems in which Pharisees stone adulteresses or Imams cut off thieves' hands. Or on a less draconian plane, sinners are called out and publicly shamed, shunned, or excommunicated. The second prescribed remedy for sin is self-control. Although select individuals may be able to overcome sin on their own, this is not likely to be a universal solution for society or civilization. Only Jesus promises supernatural power to live above sin. World-shrinking technologies can only be safely exercised when there is universal acceptance and exercise of this power. Come Lord Jesus!

Saturday, October 8, 2016

Hilary and Donald Cannot Remedy Our Pain

In the 21st chapter of the Gospel of John, Jesus and Peter have a discussion about love, in which Jesus inflicts psychological pain on Peter. The context of this conversation is that a few weeks earlier, on the evening of Jesus' arrest and trial, Peter had boldly declared that he would die for Jesus, and then a few hours later swore vehemently that he did not know Him. After the resurrection, Peter moped and then ran away to go fishing. Jesus was not willing to let Peter self-destruct, so He came to the shore, built a charcoal fire to use Peter's sense of smell to remind him of the night of Jesus' trial. He then asked Peter three times if he loved Him, in a reminder to Peter of the three times the bystanders at the trial had asked him if he was one of Jesus' followers.

Peter did not miss the significance of Jesus' words. There is an interplay on the words used for love in this interchange that many other expositors have written on. The substance of this psychotherapy session is that Peter did not think that he was capable of loving Jesus as Jesus loved him. He had failed. He had denied knowing Jesus and even if Jesus forgave him, he could neither forgive himself nor think that he would do any better the next time. Reliving that event must have been psychological agony. But Jesus saw what Peter did not, that the coming of the Holy Spirit would fundamentally and profoundly change Peter. He even told him that he would one day have the strength to die for Jesus, which church history records happened a few decades later.

Why did Jesus inflict this psychic pain on Peter? Jesus knew that Peter had to move beyond his failure and continue to grow, in order to fulfill the future that He had for him. And so, what makes the pain justifiable is not that Peter got emotional closure or psychological rebalancing, but that he would one day (soon) live a life and say and do things that would fulfill him and his life's calling to be a fisher of men.

We all experience pain. Not just the physical pain that results from bodily injury, but the psychological and emotional pain that comes from things we have said and done, and from things that others said or did to us. As Stephen Hiemstra wrote, "Self-centered rumination is a heavy burden, not a light one." Unlike daily life, God uses pain not for chastising us, but for making us like Him. C. S. Lewis wrote, in his book on this subject,
“We can ignore even pleasure. But pain insists upon being attended to. God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks in our conscience, but shouts in our pains: it is his megaphone to rouse a deaf world.”
The bottom line is that God so desires that we become like Him in His attributes of love and holiness that He will use any means necessary to move us towards that goal. If He was willing for Jesus to die on the cross and endure the weight of the sins of the whole world, including the punishment justly due for those sins, why would He do any less to get us to experience His divine character in our daily life?

Sin has consequences. Whether we reap the consequences in our own life or inflict consequences on others, cause and effect are inescapable, apart from the grace of God. The government is not God. Government can mitigate some of the consequences but runs the peril of encouraging sin if the consequences are removed. In Christianity this is sometimes called "cheap grace". (Romans 5:20 & 6:1)

Politics seems to have morphed within my lifetime from the casting of vision to an appeal to anger and pain. Before blaming the current crop of politicians for leading in that direction, perhaps we should consider why those who tap into that current of anger and rage receive so much support in the ballot box. Why? To paraphrase Shakespeare, the problem lies not in our pols, but in ourselves. It is far easier to blame someone else for our problems than to own up to our own failures, because that would be painful. We accuse others of stealing from us, taking advantage of us, or treating us unjustly, and then expect the government to fix it. This is not leading us toward heaven on earth, but earthly hell.

For our society to flourish, pain must be redemptive, not destructive. The blame game and the associated anger will simply destroy. What does this path look like? Pain must be embraced, and this means to not look for a solution that will make it go away. Whether we blame crime or unemployment on illegal immigration, building a wall is not a solution for sin. Blaming the fat cats or Wall Street barons for poverty and redistributing their wealth does not solve sin. Only Jesus can forgive sin and then empower us to live free from it, on an individual basis, regardless of circumstances.


The problem is not that our politicians are making self-serving accusations or promises. The problem is that we are looking to government to fix things that it is impossible for government to fix. Hilary and Donald cannot remedy our pain. Perhaps we must render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, but we should not make the mistake of hailing Caesar as a god, much less expecting Caesar to do what only God can do.