Saturday, November 26, 2016

Build the Wall? Tear Down the Walls in our Hearts!

Ask the Chinese, Hadrian, the French. History suggests that walls often do not accomplish the ends for which they were built, although as defensive fortifications they can serve a limited purpose. As a means to control the movement of people they are less effective. No human wall can separate the righteous from the evil. It is in our hearts that we build walls to keep God from us; He honors those walls, but we are the worse for it.

The Chinese began building defensive walls as early as the 7th Century BC. The Qin dynasty greatly emphasized the building project (220-206 BC), tearing down walls that divided the previously warring feudal states and completing and connecting a defensive wall along the northern frontier. The wall that remains to modern times was built mostly during the Ming dynasty (1368-1644 AD), being built of bricks and stones, rather than boards and rammed earth.  There are multiple lines of fortifications because of shifting geopolitical dynamics over the course of two millennia, and estimates of the total length of walls range from 8,850 to approximately 21,200 km, depending on what is included in the survey. The height of the sections typically seen in modern times ranges from 5 to 8 meters with width of 5 to 6 meters. The Great Wall had multiple objectives over the many centuries when it was built. Most  builders were motivated by the need for defensive fortifications against raids or conquest. The Qing dynasty (1644 - 1912 AD) built a section called the Willow Palisade in Manchuria in the late 17th century for migration control. The term "Great Wall" was adopted for the entire network during this period.

Hadrian's wall was built 122-128 AD during the Roman Empire's control of England, to control raids by the Picts. It was approximately 117 km long, ranging from 3.5-6 m high, and 2-3 m wide. Its remains are a historical artifact to this day. Its construction may have been motivated strongly by internal Roman politics, defining the limits of the Empire, more than actual utility in controlling invading raids or armies. In later years the Romans attempted to control the Scottish lowlands north of the wall, up to the Antonine wall approximately 100 km further north, but this was unsuccessful.

The Maginot Line's purpose was to keep Germany from invading France after the First World War. Constructed from 1930 to 1939, it consisted of a string of heavily fortified strong points with artillery commanding the surrounding countryside. It ran approximately 700 km from the border of Switzerland to the border of Belgium. The German invasion of France in 1940 bypassed it by invading through Belgium. According to some sources, this was part of the purpose of the wall, to force Germany to violate other nations' sovereignty if/when they invaded France, drawing them (and others, such as Great Britain) into any war with Germany.

There are a few common features  of these walls. They were built primarily to prevent military incursion by an armed invader. For this reason, they had strong points or garrisons periodically along the length of the wall, which patrolled and were able to respond to intrusions or assaults. They had gates or openings at various points, to allow for normal daily traffic of daily business, because the wall was not a total bar to commerce.

How successful were they at accomplishing their objectives? The Chinese dynasties that were in power remained so for centuries. The Ming dynasty suffered military defeats and it is hard to tell if the wall materially affected the outcome of their battles or campaigns. The Roman Empire abandoned Great Britain about 410 AD. As mentioned above, the German army made an end run around the Maginot Line, invading France by way of Belgium in 1940. The effectiveness of the Willow Palisade in controlling migration is hard to assess. Over the course of a few centuries, there appears to have been some. Was it slower than it otherwise would have been because of the wall?

Biblical accounts of walls virtually all focus on city walls, whose purpose was twofold. The primary purpose was to fortify the city against assault by an invader. Another purpose was to control the entry of individuals to the city.

The city walls of Jericho were mentioned first as an obstacle to the Israelite spies, in that they had to escape over them (Joshua 2:15) since the gates were shut. Nevertheless, everyone knows the ultimate outcome; "Joshua fit the battle of Jericho and the walls came a tumblin' down." (Joshua 6:20)

The walls of Jerusalem were symbolic of the safety and security of its inhabitants. Notably, the end of the kingdom of Judah was marked when the walls were breached, the city destroyed, and the king and his family were captured, circa 587 BC. (2 Kings 25) Nehemiah was devoted to rebuilding the walls as a means of re-establishing the security and safety of the Israelites who returned to Palestine after the Babylonian captivity circa 445 BC. (Nehemiah 2:17) The walls were again breached, and the city leveled in 70 AD by the Romans under general (later emperor) Titus.

When we plan to build a wall, we need to consider its purpose, connect that purpose to the attributes it will need to accomplish that purpose, consider the broader context in which it will function, and lessons that previous walls might teach. Aside from a powerful symbol of xenophobia, why would we build a wall?. Would a wall stop people from coming here illegally? It might slow some down, but even so there are many other venues for determined people to travel. The context for this wall is broad. We already have border patrol, INS, innumerable laws, regulations, and the executive orders. We have a society with a large number of legal immigrants, and an economy in which both legal and illegal immigrants participate. We have a pluralistic culture in every dimension imaginable.

Revelation 21:10-26 describes the new Jerusalem in considerable detail, waxing eloquent on both walls and gates. Whether this is a spiritual metaphor or a literal future heavenly place (or both), the key point is Revelation 21:27.   The people of God are within it and no one who practices abomination and lying shall enter. Revelation 22:15 elaborates that outside are dogs and sorcerers and immoral persons and murderers and idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lying. Revelation 7:9 stands in stark contrast, showing worship before the throne of God by a vast multitude no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language. The criterion for those God values is clear.


Entry via the gates is only possible through Christ; Revelation 21:21 shows the gates as pearls, and Jesus is the Pearl of Great Price (Matthew 13:45-46). The apostles, and the church they began by preaching the gospel, are the foundation of the New Jerusalem. (Revelation 21:14) All are invited, but only those who repent of their sin and receive Jesus as their Lord and Savior are actually able to enter. Those who cling to their sin cannot come into His presence. (2 Thessalonians 1:9) Everyone wants to go to heaven. But not everyone is willing to pay the price of surrendering to Jesus as Lord. Any wall in our hearts that separates us from Christ must be torn down, or we will not enter in.

Friday, November 11, 2016

Book Review - Life in Tension

Life in Tension, by Stephen Hiemstra, dives deep into the context and intentions of the beatitudes. The blessings (makarios) of the beatitudes provide the New Testament fulfillment of the Old Testament call to peace (shalom). In the beatitudes Jesus points out that our experience of God's shalom is hindered by our sin and lack of commitment to Him, bringing tension within ourselves, between us and others, and between us and God.

The author's numerous insights connect Old Testament and New Testament scripture, history, and culture to Jesus' timeless words. He illustrates how our lives, culture, and choices are affected by rejection of Jesus' revelations. Some examples of Jesus' spiritual truths translated into our modern lives:
    Modern technology worsens the already heavy burden of self-centered rumination.
    God blesses those who are willing, who beg destitution in the spiritual realm, with the kingdom of God.
    Taking the next step to extend God's law fulfills it, not merely staying within its boundaries.
    We can receive blessing, forgiveness, and healing through true humility; or else God will act sovereignly, which may be harder on us.
    Pain we bear shapes our identity and transforms us.
    For us, meekness is a fruit of the Spirit; for God, it is just who He is.
    We are pushed to break the fundamental commandments of God's economy in our pursuit of the wealth of Pharaoh's economy,
    In the parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus changed the question from "Who is my neighbor?" to His own question (to us), "Who proved to be a neighbor?"
    Hypocrisy or tension? Christians who act like everyone else are called hypocrites; those who do not are seen as judgmental.
    We cannot end war, but we can at least express the love of Christ to the needy person who crosses our path.
    Matthew 5:11 repeats and intensifies Matthew 5:10 with three verbs and a shift from third person to second person, as redemptive suffering is the capstone beatitude.
    We do not naturally mourn over sin in our lives; we seek comfort, not transformation.

Jesus' bottom line calls us beyond receiving and believing truth, to allowing it to transform us.