What will the post-apocalyptic world be like?

‘Apocalypse’ has become synonymous with a civilization-ending world-wide series of cataclysms. The genre of doomsday movies and of life afterwards portrays an earth ruined by nuclear war and rampant plagues, lack of basic necessities like food, in which individuals or small groups struggle to survive. The apocalyptic reference goes back to Revelation 1:1, the Greek word for revelation being apocalypse, the very first word in the book, linked to the worldwide catastrophes described therein. These events are also described in Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 17 & 21, and Ezekiel 38-39.  

Returning to Revelation 1:1, the verse says … “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must soon take place; and He sent and communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John.” [NASB]  Substitute unveiling for revelation. This is the prophecy that unveils the mysteries associated with Jesus. These aren’t mysteries to believers - those who know Christ and serve Him - but these events will resolve mysteries of Christ to the world. That this unveiling involves calamity for the world system is an indicator of how depraved it is.

The accounts are indeed terrifying. In fact, in Mark 13:20 Jesus says that unless the Lord had shortened the days, no life would be saved. But the important part from the Biblical perspective is that the love and holiness and power and glory of Jesus’ divinity will be revealed for all to see. And then He will reign on the earth, just as He does in heaven. This reign will begin with 1,000 years of peace and righteousness as described in Revelation 20, because Satan will be bound. It does not say how long it will take to rebuild the earth from the devastation that will result from mankind’s rebellion, Satan’s war, and God’s setting things right. But with Christ physically and visibly reigning on the earth, there will not be the dysfunctional anarchy portrayed in the post-apocalyptic film genre. What Jesus is, He will remake human society to.

What is Jesus like? We get a hybrid picture of His behavior during the Incarnation, when He was on earth in the flesh, and the image of Him in heaven recorded in Revelation 1:12-18. His love is declared openly, but not with emotional attachment as its primary focus; His love chooses and wills the best long-term outcome for the beloved, whatever the cost to Him or to others. And because of His uncompromising holiness, this will result in pain over sin. He paid the price in His suffering on the cross, but we will experience pain when He disciplines us for our own good, so that we may share His holiness. (Hebrews 12:4-11) 

The Second Coming by Ron DiCianni

The outcome is that we enter into His joy.  This is the post-apocalyptic world we can expect. In the millennial reign of Christ, swords will be beaten into plowshares, righteousness will be the norm, the wolf will lie down with the lamb, with longevity and rejoicing in the Lord’s presence. (Isaiah 2:2-4, 11, & 65:11-24). I challenge Hollywood to portray that!

Eternity without Christ is ...

What is hell? Functionally, it is the eternal, spiritual destination of the devil and his angels, and of those who reject Christ. The question in my mind is what does it look like and what happens there? Jesus gave few specifics, nothing beyond saying that the their worm does not die and their fire is not quenched. (Mark 9:48)

Traditional imagery has pictured hell as a perpetual blast furnace (unquenched fire). Something like the third chapter of Daniel, except that the Hebrew young men and the Son of God were not harmed by that furnace. Fire is punishment, causing eternal torment. 

Let me propose a slightly different view. Fire also purifies, especially metals, from impurities. Perhaps in this eternal destination, God directly purifies those who cling to rebellion against Him. For those who love sin, this purification of sins they hold on to results in perpetual pain, because their vice is denied. Perhaps it is eternal insomnia in the middle of darkness in which the memory of actions and choices, now regretted, cannot be avoided by sleep and can no longer be remedied by repentance and atonement. A bad conscience for all eternity. Or perhaps God cleanses that by eliminating it, and there is nothing left but an empty shell, unable to enter His presence. 

C. S. Lewis offered another view in The Great Divorce. He addresses the question of how a loving God could send people to hell by picturing a post-death tableau in which people are offered the opportunity to go into God’s Presence but choose not to, for a variety of stupid reasons. The reasons are stupid because people choose transient soulish activities, and emotional relationship manipulation over permanent, transcendent bliss. And in Lewis’ depiction of hell, people reside in (can’t say live in because they are dead) ethereal dwellings in an endless slum, in which they keep moving farther and farther apart because they can’t stand each other.

Jesus said that hell was prepared for the devil and his angels. (Matthew 25:41) This certainly implies some forcible restraint because the demons don’t want to be there (Luke 8:31). In some respect their powers are curtailed. But their essential nature is unchanged since they chose to reject God’s love and holiness in full knowledge of the eternal consequences of that choice. They will eternally persevere in being fundamentally evil at heart. They have it, but I doubt they will like it.

Another possible view of hell might be that it is not a separation from God’s presence, but being in His presence, and the torture of feeling the pain of having our life essence being purified by His holiness. But this does not seem consistent with Scripture, which in several places has Jesus saying “Depart….” So perhaps sending people away from His presence is an act of mercy on God’s part. Their torture in the outer darkness is that they can no longer prey on those who have chosen God, and they recognize what they are missing out on because of their choice of evil instead.

We have a choice in this life: Jesus offers eternal life to those who will receive Him and choose to receive, however imperfectly, the nature and character of God. God is love. (1 John 4:7) He defines agape as sacrificial self-giving for the good of another, as demonstrated in Jesus’ death on the cross to redeem humankind. Not some namby-pamby feel-good emotional high, but a positive visceral, moral and ethical virtue or attribute. Willing and working for the best, long-term good of another. 

Hell will unfortunately include the ultimate reaping the fruits of sins, with the demons laughing at humans who foolishly chose them. It will be the eternal outcome of their own decisions and actions. For those who do not choose Christ, an endless eternity of emptiness; wanting something they can never have; all alone in pain and rejection remorse; emotional and physical desires always there but no way to satisfy them; knowing others are in heaven and enjoying God’s presence, while they have nothing; burning in their desires but no way to make the pain stop. Whatever its exact makeup, if we are separated from Christ, it will be hell.

Book Review: Deliver Us From Evil by Don Basham

Originally published in 1972, Don Basham’s book, Deliver Us From Evil, starts with an autobiographical storyline of how the Lord led him into a ministry of deliverance. This book does not deal with evil on a national or global scale -  Nazi Germany, or gang warfare in 4th world countries. The author tells of his experiences ministering to people dealing with personal evil. One hears about such individuals all too frequently in today’s headlines of mass shootings. But this book deals with the spiritual evil that simply messes up individual people’s  lives. 

Don Basham was part of the Charismatic Renewal that exploded in the 1960’s as God began to pour out the Holy Spirit on those in many different churches who were open to Him. The author  was not the first to have a ministry that included deliverance, as he frequently acknowledges. He relates his story in an accessible, matter-of-fact narrative. Demons are real and they mess up lives, so much that Jesus devoted a quarter of His ministry on earth to dealing with them. They are still around, despite having been defeated by Jesus 2,000 years ago. The first half of the book relates stories of the author learning to take this victory to the lives of those who are so afflicted and seeking release. 

The last half of the book expounds the principles of the ministry, dealing with the basic questions such as:

• How to discern whether a particular issue is just human depravity (sin) or supernatural (demonic) oppression. 
• The steps to perform deliverance,  for another person or for one’s self.
• How to keep the victory once gained over demonic attack.

The key point in all this is that Jesus has won the victory over the world, the flesh, and the devil 2,000 years ago, but we need to receive it from Him. There is a war going on that will not end until the return of Christ. If it seems that the evening news shows a broad offensive by evil against human civilization and society, then we need to go to boot camp so that we can be effective soldiers in this fight. Spiritual warfare is fought on all levels and we must engage the enemy when we encounter him. The authority of Jesus Christ, invoked by His name and the Word of God spoken by those who know and trust Him, is our weapon, and we must learn to use it. The need for the full armor of God (Ephesians 6:11-17 ) become obvious  necessities once we recognize the realities of the war in heavenly realms that we are in. Bringing Christ into every situation will subdue evil far more effectively than government initiatives, however well-intentioned they may be, because Jesus will intervene to defeat the root cause of evil.

California Dreamin of Heaven

The Mamas and the Papas hit, recorded by the Beach Boys in 1986,  epitomized the feelings of discouragement and longing for relief so common to life. The Beach Boys' earlier song (1965) California Girls characterized youthful focus on fleshly pleasures. Today’s California exhibits neither of these attributes in the popular mind, except perhaps a wistful memory. What does this say to us? 

El Camino Real was first established by dedicated missionaries, who were called to establish bastions of Christianity in this part of the new world. Missions were established starting in 1683 (almost a century before the road was built) and many stand to this day was a testimony. Indeed the names of many cities, e.g. San Diego, Santa Barbara, San Jose, San Francisco,  remind us of this heritage. (That sometimes the missionaries did not live up to the standards of Jesus does not diminish the fact of their zeal for Him.)

The Gold Rush, starting in 1848 (after California was ceded to the U.S. following the Mexican War), appealed to those who sought instant wealth. Most of the consequences of this flood of immigrants were predictable, as the forty-niners’ greed, and the disease and lifestyle they brought decimated native Americans, and probably did not improve their lifestyle. [The outcomes for individuals who struck it rich were likely not much different from those who win the lottery in our day.] But this established a concept of California in popular culture that endures.

California became a place to run away to. The prodigal son went to a far country to squander his father’s wealth. Many since the gold rush fled to California, not to spend their inheritance, but perhaps to escape a miserable life, or to get a new start in life. When my maternal great uncle, who was born and raised in Michigan, married a divorced woman, this so offended the other members of his family the he and his bride moved to California in the 1920’s to escape, and had no further contact with them. My father’s parents divorced when he was nine, and continued their war so meanly that my father left Michigan to attend USC in 1941 to escape their incessant battles. California beckoned. 

Migrant workers traditionally were viewed as temporary laborers who came from Mexico to California (and a few other states) to be exploited by, I mean, to provide labor for the harvest. Many, perhaps most, traditionally returned home each year. Modern migrants have set up permanent tent encampments on the streets of major cities in California  (and other western states). This immigration has been dealt with elsewhere, but undoubtedly these migrants view California as the earthly culmination of their quest for a better life. 

Image from Nations Online Project

Recent conditions almost sound like divine judgment. Wildfires and high temperatures suggest a certain supernatural location that is not anybody’s preferred eternal destination. Anyone who has driven in the big metropolitan areas is acquainted with the driving habits of their denizens. Housing prices have soared beyond outrageous to ludicrous. Dare we ask why?

There is a basic problem. It is called original sin (theologically), but we are all acquainted with this problem in practical experience. When we run away, or move to a new location to better our lives, we take ourselves with us. And we have an adversary who will deceive us in unfamiliar settings, and then accuse us when we succumb to his lies. This is not unique to California, but universal to humankind. Why did Jacob go to Paddan-aram to find a wife? Why did Abram go to Egypt when there was a famine? They had legitimate issues and God met them where they went, but the point was that He used their travels as part of His plan to redeem them from self.

We can’t run away from ourselves - our baggage is internal to us until we take it to Jesus

Consulting others and finding Truth

Rehoboam and James - wise and foolish politics

I Kings 12 relates the story of King Rehoboam deciding how to respond to a request from all Israel, sent through Jeroboam, asking the new king to lighten their load (hard labor, taxes).  Acts 15 relates the story of the council in Jerusalem in which the Apostles were asked to require gentile converts to Christianity to be circumcised. There are differences in the context, but the most important lesson is in the differences in execution.

Rehoboam was the undisputed heir of Solomon’s throne. He had no parliament to deal with, but he had advisors, as had his father. When the request came to him, he took time to consult his father’s advisers, and then to consult the young men who had grown up with him. There is no mention of prophets being asked at all. And then he decided which answer he would give. That was it. I Kings 12:16-20 records the consequences of his foolish decision. After that, a prophet finally appears on the scene (verses 22-24).

When Paul arrived in Jerusalem and told of the amazing work of the Holy Spirit among the gentiles, legalists insisted that Judaism was the path to Christ. Circumcision was given as a sign that the Jews were set apart from the nations, going back to Abraham. (Genesis 17:9-14) The apostles and elders gathered to look into the question. There was a vigorous debate (Acts 15:7) Peter then recounted the story of his visit to the household of Cornelius (Acts 10), and then Paul and Barnabas told of God’s working among the gentiles in their journeys. And then James gave his decision. Superficially, it might look like the process was the same. Rehoboam decided to follow his friends’ advice, James decided to accept Paul’s recommendation.

But there is a layer deeper. There is no suggestion that Rehoboam sought dialog between his two sets of advisors. James evidently had them all in the same room, enough so that they argued vigorously, discussing no doubt the basis for their recommendations. This contrast would appear to recommend the best path to make wise decisions would be the thesis – antithesis – synthesis paradigm; integrate everyone’s perspective into a unified outcome.

And so, in modern life, can we distill principles that are universally applicable? The easiest lesson is that of Proverbs 15:22, that many counselors enable plans to succeed. The implication is that no single person had a monopoly on truth or wisdom, and it is in the process of debating an issue that wisdom and successful plans emerge. Perhaps if Rehoboam had gathered all the advisors together so that they could debate the merits of their recommendations a reasonable compromise might have emerged. We will never know.

However, yet another layer of contrast can be seen. Rehoboam’s decision (1 Kings 12:14) had no hint of listening to either the people or his father’s advisors, or even any of the prophets. He was king and his word was law. James’ decision, recorded in Acts 15:22-29, did not say there are no requirements on how gentile believers should live. The letter, composed by committee, said there are fundamental norms for behavior, and that only the burden of the ceremonial law was lifted. They mentioned the Holy Spirit’s guidance. It was not a compromise, but a distillation of a new truth about the relationship between God and His people that emerged from interaction between apparently irreconcilable parties.

But I correct myself, and herein is the key. One Man has all Truth, He was the way, the truth, and the life. (John 14:6) If you search for the word wisdom in Proverbs you can find almost 50 verses. Many of them refer to wisdom as coming from the Lord. (E.g., 1:7, 2:6, 9:10, 15:33) This is the most fundamental difference between Rehoboam and the early apostles. Rehoboam wanted a practical answer and took bad advice. James and Peter and Paul wanted to hear what the Lord wanted them to do (not just what was efficient or expedient), and looked to the counsel of others to discern His will. James quoted Amos 9:11-12 to link their present situation to God’s promise of saving the gentiles. Ultimately the group collectively wrote the letter and sent a delegation to Antioch to convey that this was a community consensus on God’s will.

We cannot impose faith into matters of worldly politics, because so few in the world know the Lord. (Although God desires all men everywhere to be saved.) Hence, there is no cure here for rancorous political disputes. But although there are believers in both parties to every political dispute, it seems inconceivable that they could meet together to seek to hear the Lord’s voice and jointly discern His will. Not that He wouldn’t reveal it, but that most politicians would not risk alienating their base by meeting with the enemy. And herein lies the lingering infection in our political system. Believing politicians value how their voters perceive them over their desire to know God closely and do His will. Would that they would recognize the implicit truth that if God has called and gifted an individual for leadership, it is for His purposes, not theirs. How great is our God!

Book Review: Abandonment to Divine Providence by Jean-Pierre de Caussade

This book was first published in French in the 18th century as the sacrament of the present moment, and still appearing in English translations under both titles.  The subtitle is ‘how to fulfill your daily duties with God-given purpose’. The two sections deal with the virtue of abandonment to divine providence, and the state of abandonment.

The virtue described is that of allowing God to work His will in our life. He sanctifies us, setting us apart for His purposes, when we fully submit to all He does. We can only do this through obedience, without waiting for a full understanding of His design. This is not a call for all believers to some great endeavor, but simple trust by doing what He says in the moment-by-moment duties of everyday life. DeCaussade goes on to discuss how we can discover God’s will for us individually, and that is the source of our sanctification. Ultimately everything in our life becomes taken up in this supernatural activity enabled by abandoning ourselves to God’s will, focusing on present moment He has placed us in.

DeCaussade’s description of the state of abandonment includes the nature of this state, its excellence, the duties (in a bit more detail), God’s workings on those in this state, and the trials accompanying it. The virtues of faith, hope, and love unite us to God in a single decision. It is (and must be) a free decision. Those who choose this, to purify their heart of worldly desires, are blessed with spiritual graces. But the cost is that there will be trials - to be misunderstood and maligned by other believers not on this road, to be mocked by those in the world, to be humiliated in our own eyes so that we distrust ourselves, and to be tested by the adversary. We are blessed when we recognize that God despoils all things other than Himself (worldly treasures, worldly values, church practices that others deem to earn holiness, self-created works or actions designed to please God) so that we will recognize that our true treasure is Him and Him alone. We even find our enemies to be a useful help for us to grow in grace. Ultimately, we will learn to recognize God at work in all creatures and situations.

Such a state might seem to encourage passivity, as we wait for God to tell us what to do. However, this is the exact opposite of the author’s understanding. Total abandonment to God means putting all our energy into finding out what He wants us to do, and in responding and doing actively all the things we know He has already asked us for. The much harder challenge, IMHO, is to give up all the desires for worldly and personal stuff, as He reveals to us one by one that they stand between Him and us. Even as we say we have decided to give it all to Him, it is a daily growing process and new decision for the next step. That is the challenge laid before us.

Book Review: Waiting for the Morning Train - An American Boyhood by Bruce Catton

Civil War historian Bruce Catton tells a delightful story of a carefree childhood in Benzonia, Michigan, from 1899 to 1916. He later realized (book was written when he was 72 or 73) that the delight in his childhood was totally oblivious to the realty of the situation. During this period, the last of the virgin forest of the northern lower peninsula of Michigan was being harvested for lumber and shipped out. And that when the virgin forests were gone, the economy collapsed. The land was poor for farming and the vacation/resort industry was just getting started. 

Benzonia was established around an academy that was founded by committed Christians who purposed to bring enlightenment to the workers and residents in the boondocks. He tells of his childhood activities in this environment, playing with his friends in a small town and in the wilderness. He talks about his schooling, his classmates, being in the band, and various church activities. Bruce Catton’s father taught for some years, eventually ran the academy for a few years. In 1916 the author left for Oberlin College. One year after his father’s departure departure from the academy, it closed.

Bruce Catton was two years younger than my grandfather, also born in Michigan. A completely different story - his father was a lighthouse keeper and he was raised by his aunts. He worked as an accountant raising his family through the Great Depression, and ultimately was quite successful in the world of business. But I never heard any stories from him about an idyllic childhood. Catton was privileged to enjoy the childhood he had

In his retirement, Bruce Catton wrote this memoir (published in 1972) to ruminate on parallel themes. In youth, we have no idea what lies ahead, and the world is full of possibilities. In mankind’s early days, the world was unlimited in space, in resources, in opportunity. At the cusp of the transition from adolescence to manhood, the future seems bright. In Catton’s experience, the First World War, the collapse of the Benzonia academy were realities that broke in. (He never finished college and was awarded an honorary degree in 1956). Mankind has been systematically using the resources of the earth, using them up, and some day there will be a reckoning, as with the collapse of the lumber industry in northern Michigan. He vaguely alludes to using up resources such as minerals, etc., but 50 years later, with the climate inching towards a warmer worldwide temperature with a higher frequency of severe storms, droughts, and the like, he seems like a prophet. He never referenced scriptures like Luke 21:11 or Revelation 6:8.

And so the author wraps up his metaphor of childhood being like waiting for the morning train, which he would board to an exciting adventure in life. The ending is the night train, old age, having seen the failure of dreams, boarding the sleeper car. Regrettably, he apparently lacked the belief, or did not want to proselytize, about the glorious hope recorded in Revelation 19.